STL · 3MF
STL vs 3MF
Both formats carry a mesh to a slicer. 3MF adds what STL lacks: a declared unit, colours, materials and a build plate that can hold several objects.
| Criterion | STL | 3MF |
|---|---|---|
| What it stores | Triangles only | Mesh, units, materials and objects |
| Units | None; millimetres are assumed | Declared in the file, usually millimetres |
| Colours and materials | None | Base colours and materials |
| Several objects | Shells without names | Objects with names and placement |
| Slicer support | Universal | Modern Bambu Studio, PrusaSlicer and Cura |
| File size | Small | Larger ZIP/XML package |
In short. Use 3MF when your slicer supports it and you care about units, colours or multi-object plates. Keep STL as the universal fallback for older tools and simple meshes.
Convert between them
Format pages
Questions
Is 3MF better than STL?+
For modern slicers yes: units, colours and objects. STL stays the safest fallback.
Can I convert 3MF to STL?+
Yes, but colours, materials and object names are lost.
Why is my 3MF the wrong size?+
Check the import unit in your slicer; 3MF declares one, STL does not.